/
/
/
Optimization of Aeration Strategies in Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor for Hospital Wastewater Treatment

Optimization of Aeration Strategies in Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor for Hospital Wastewater Treatment

Original Research ArticleFeb 17, 2026Online First Articles https://doi.org/10.55003/cast.2026.266517

Abstract

The growing complexity of hospital wastewater presents significant challenges for traditional treatment methods, highlighting the need for innovative and energy-efficient alternatives. This study investigated the effect of different aeration strategies on the biological removal efficiency of carbon and nitrogen in a laboratory-scale moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR). The system was operated under three aeration conditions: continuous aeration and two intermittent aeration regimes. The results show that intermittent aeration enhanced nitrogen removal through simultaneous nitrification-denitrification (SND) while maintaining high organic matter degradation efficiency. In Phase I (continuous aeration), carbon removal efficiency reached 87.4%, whereas total nitrogen removal remained below 20% due to the absence of anoxic conditions. In contrast, intermittent aeration in Phases II and III significantly improved nitrogen removal to 82.5% and 87.8%, respectively, while achieving comparable carbon removal rates. The most effective operational mode involved a 40-min aeration period followed by 20 min without aeration, facilitating denitrification and minimizing energy consumption. Furthermore, the system maintained stable biofilm development, with mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) concentrations ranging from 1.9 to 3.3 g/L. Despite the low MLSS concentration, the system consistently exhibited high treatment performance, underscoring the robustness of biofilm-based processes in MBBR systems. These findings highlight the potential of optimized aeration strategies in MBBR systems to enhance treatment efficiency while reducing operational costs. This study provides valuable guidance for designing sustainable hospital wastewater treatment systems that meet stringent regulatory standards.

hospital wastewater
biological treatment
MBBR
aeration
nitrogen removal

How to Cite

Sriromreun, P. ., Lerkmahalikit, Y. ., Thongson, S. ., & Theepharaksapan, S. . (2026). Optimization of Aeration Strategies in Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor for Hospital Wastewater Treatment. Current Applied Science and Technology, e0266517. https://doi.org/10.55003/cast.2026.266517

References

  • Accinelli, C., Saccà, M. L., Mencarelli, M., & Vicari, A. (2012). Application of bioplastic moving bed biofilm carriers for the removal of synthetic pollutants from wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 120, 180-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.056
  • Almomani, F., & Bohsale, R. R. (2020). Optimizing nutrient removal of moving bed biofilm reactor process using response surface methodology. Bioresource Technology, 305, Article 123059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123059
  • APHA. (2017). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (23rd Ed.). American Public Health Association.
  • Bhandari, G., Chaudhary, P., Gangola, S., Gupta, S., Gupta, A., Rafatullah, M., & Chen, S. (2023). A review on hospital wastewater treatment technologies: Current management practices and future prospects. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 56, Article 104516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104516
  • Boavida-Dias, R., Silva, J. R., Santos, A. D., Martins, R. C., Castro, L. M., & Quinta-Ferreira, R. M. (2022). A comparison of biosolids production and system efficiency between activated sludge, moving bed biofilm reactor, and sequencing batch moving bed biofilm reactor in the dairy wastewater treatment. Sustainability, 14(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052702

Author Information

Paranee Sriromreun

Department of Chemical Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Srinakharinwirot University, Nakhon Nayok, 26120, Thailand

Yanika Lerkmahalikit

Central Instruments Center Building, Excellent Center Sustainable, Engineering faculty, Srinakharinwirot University, Nakhon Nayok, 26120, Thailand

Suchira Thongson

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Srinakharinwirot University, Nakhon Nayok, 26120, Thailand

Suthida Theepharaksapan

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Srinakharinwirot University, Nakhon Nayok, 26120, Thailand

About this Article

Journal

Online First Articles

Type of Manuscript

Original Research Article

Published

17 February 2026